Pakistan: jailed Imran Khan — justice, or military persecution?

Published May 31, 2026 · 08:00 GMT

Three years into Imran Khan's imprisonment, his PTI faces sustained repression while the army under Gen Munir entrenches its dominance. Khan says it's political persecution; the establishment frames the cases as lawful.

The summary above is a neutral framing. Below, each side reports the same story in its own words — judge for yourself.

Imran Khan / PTI

Khan and PTI say his jailing and the crackdown are engineered by the military 'establishment' and a compliant government to crush Pakistan's most popular party.

Military / government

The army and ruling coalition cast the cases against Khan as lawful and themselves as guarantors of stability — even as critics document censorship and repression.

More in Politics

Politics Jun 11

UK defence secretary resigns over military spending, in blow to Starmer

Defence Secretary John Healey quit on June 11, publishing a resignation letter that accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Treasury of failing to fund the armed forces adequately at a dangerous moment. The government's side is the fiscal case: defence spending is already rising at a record pace, but must be balanced against strained public finances, weak growth forecasts and competing departmental demands.

Politics Jun 10

Trump downsizes US intelligence under interim chief Pulte: overdue reform, or politicizing the spies?

President Trump has directed interim national intelligence chief Bill Pulte to downsize the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and is sticking with him despite a looming lapse in surveillance powers. The administration frames it as cutting a bloated bureaucracy; critics — Democrats and even some Republicans — call Pulte, a Trump loyalist with no intelligence background, unqualified and warn the move politicizes US intelligence.

Politics Jun 9

Congress passes $70bn immigration crackdown — border security or cruelty?

Congress has now passed the $70 billion package to fund ICE and Border Patrol through 2029 — the House sent it to President Trump's desk after the Senate's narrow 52-47 vote — without banning Trump's controversial 'anti-weaponization' fund. Republicans call it securing the border; Democrats call it cruelty plus a slush fund.