← World
74 lashes for a song: is Iran's sentence on singer Parastoo Ahmadi justice or torture?

74 lashes for a song: is Iran's sentence on singer Parastoo Ahmadi justice or torture?

A court in Qom sentenced singer Parastoo Ahmadi and eight collaborators to 74 lashes, a two-year travel ban, and a ban on artistic activity, for a 2024 YouTube concert performed without hijab. Rights groups call it cultural repression and torture; Iranian authorities say it is routine enforcement of public morality law under the Islamic Penal Code.

The summary above is a neutral framing. Below, each side reports the same story in its own words — judge for yourself.

Rights groups / artists

Amnesty International and RFE/RL frame the ruling as cultural repression — 74 lashes, a two-year ban on performing, and a travel ban — for singing a well-known patriotic anthem at an empty theatre with eight crew members. 'This is torture,' Ahmadi's lawyer said.

Iranian courts

Iran's Qom Provincial Criminal Court convicted Ahmadi under Article 638 of the Islamic Penal Code — which criminalises 'open religious taboo' and acts offending public decency — alongside Article 743, which bans producing 'vulgar and immoral content' online. Authorities frame the verdict as a routine legal ruling, not political targeting.

More in World

Zimbabwe's parliament votes to keep Mnangagwa in power until 2030 and let lawmakers pick the president: stability or power grab?
World Jun 19

Zimbabwe's parliament votes to keep Mnangagwa in power until 2030 and let lawmakers pick the president: stability or power grab?

Zimbabwe's lower house of parliament passed a bill by a two-thirds majority to extend presidential terms from five to seven years — allowing President Emmerson Mnangagwa to stay in power until 2030, two years beyond his original mandate. The bill also proposes shifting from a direct popular vote to selection of the president by lawmakers, a move critics say removes democratic accountability. Activists and war veterans who mounted legal challenges saw their cases struck off the court roll this week on technical grounds. Mnangagwa came to power via a 2017 military coup that ousted Robert Mugabe.

Obama says the US is 'worse off' after the Iran war. Trump says it was 'unconditional surrender'. Who's right?
World Jun 19

Obama says the US is 'worse off' after the Iran war. Trump says it was 'unconditional surrender'. Who's right?

As the US-Iran ceasefire takes hold, two American presidents — one current, one former — gave opposite verdicts on what the war achieved. Donald Trump called the deal Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and has claimed his power 'has no limits.' Barack Obama, speaking at the opening of his presidential centre in Chicago, said the opposite: after 15 weeks of war, billions spent and many lives lost, 'it feels like we're back where we were before we started the war, except maybe a little bit worse off.' Both agree the ceasefire is welcome — they disagree entirely on what it means.